This is a discussion thread · 8 replies | The question below says it all. | |
 | Ruslana I chose the last.
(Oh Jesus, it took me at least 5 times to make a vote!!)
Of course it's sad to see animals bereft of their natural habitat. But, on the other hand - if we're talking about a decent zoo, animals there are taken care of, they have ... | |
 | Glenda It depends alot. They might be in a cage but im sure at the zoo they treat them right and they have everything they need, or atleast in most of them, i've been to some and not all look great. | |
 | Jack I think it depends on the nature of animals too, if the particular animal is a endangered or a vulnerable it can be kept in a zoo if we can provide home like situations(forest)  . But when talking of forests i think it's more danger to let into ... | |
| Anonymous Although any zoo cannot provide an animal with natural habitat, it is much more attractive from care point of view. An animal can always get medical aid in a zoo, which is not like that in the wild. | |
 | CaRpE_dIeM I've also voted for the last option.
I think that some animals are better in a zoo than in the nature itself, where they wouldn't even be able to survive on their one for a day. | |
 | cano Last option had my vote
Yeah I saw once about unappropriate place for those caged animal. Release them it's best for them. | |
| Anonymous Unfortunately, some animals wouldn't have survived but for zoos. So I think it is not cruel at all... | |
| Anonymous Caging animals is ALWAYS cruel! I never go to zoo. I never want to look at animals deprived of freedom. I never undertood why people wouldn't like to put themselves in cages! | |
|
|
All RSS Feeds