1 2 3 4 5
These people are aware, don't care, and the ASPCA made them mad, so they released thier hounds onto some innocent runners. I guess that the three S's might be best, but I am against guns. All guns, even for protection.
Educate yourself on salt launcers ( not guns because no deadly item could be launched from one) and then attempt to better yourself by calling me a hypocrite.
These people are aware, don't care, and the ASPCA made them mad, so they released thier hounds onto some innocent runners. I guess that the three S's might be best, but I am against guns. All guns, even for protection.

1) Take photos
2) Call the cops
3) I thought you posted that 100% of the dogs in yourneighborhood were behind radio fences or were wearing electronic collars?

Melinda Shore - Software longa, hardware brevis - (Email Removed)

The dollar has been falling for three years yet the trade deficit has increased by 60%
In my neighborhood they are. In the country where my land is, they do not. Sticks and Fists the their first choices.
In my neighborhood they are. In the country where my land is, they do not. Sticks and Fists the their first choices.

Okay, look - you've gotten a lot of suggestions ranging from installing fences to shooting the marauding dogs, and you've got excuses for why each one is impossible. Just what are you willing to do ?

Melinda Shore - Software longa, hardware brevis - (Email Removed)

The dollar has been falling for three years yet the trade deficit has increased by 60%
which is me

1. Many people are opposed to guns, for various reasons. Would you mindsaying why you are so adamant against guns.
2. Is there a web site where we could see a salt launcher? I took abrief look, but didn't find one. Is carbon dioxide used as a propellant?

I don't mind admitting, this doesn't sound like anything I'd want to face an enraged pit bull with.
Michael
Zildjian: world class cymbal of excellence.
in thread "P- Funk" (Email Removed) whittled the following words:
There are salt launchers now (not guns but with the force to make it get into the skin and sting for days), that do not require deadly force. Be educated on "self-defence" means before spouting out unusefull advice.

I suggested carrying a gun, you berated me. Michael Ball suggested deadly force, and you thanked him for saner advice.
I've been confused.
But yes, I think I AM educated on Self Defense. Thank you. If my advice was unuseful, I'm not wounded, like you seem to think I should be. It was there, free for the offering. You seem to have made up your mind what you were going to do, without taking ANY advice given here. You already seemed to know what you were going to do. Fine.
You best option is still a fence. shrug
I cannot fence of his property diddy. I still will not use a gun to scare, or shoot an animal. I have no intentions of hurting anyone's feelings, and no I don't know what to do about it still. pfunk to diddy
We have some land that we take all of our dogs to to let them run in an open "safer" ... where immidiate medical attention was called for. Any suggestion on how to keep these pesky dogs from killing my dogs?

According to your own posts, the dogs' OWNERS are the problem, not the dogs.
Unless you're prepared to deal with them, either legally (through the Sheriff, AC, a lawsuit, etc.) or physically, your best options are:
1. Don't take your dogs there anymore.
2. Sell your land and buy 25 acres somewhere else.

PS: Don't buy a gun. You sound much too stupid to use one, and would probably only shoot yourself. Or worse. One of your dogs.

Handsome Jack Morrison
*gently remove the detonator to reply by e-mail
The Top 20 Most Annoying Liberals - 2004 Edition:
http://www.rightwingnews.com/special/worst3.php
Asteroid has 1-in-60ish chance of Earth hit:
http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/space/2004-12-25-meteor-potential-hit x.htm

Correction: The risk of an Earth hit has now been recalculated to be 1-in-27ish! http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/risk/2004mn4.html
Drink up, laddies!
Show more